<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Regulation That Hurts Business and Consumer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shesright.org/2008/06/25/more-regulation-that-hurts-business-and-consumer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shesright.org/2008/06/25/more-regulation-that-hurts-business-and-consumer/</link>
	<description>Someone's gotta be right around here.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:23:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charity</title>
		<link>http://shesright.org/2008/06/25/more-regulation-that-hurts-business-and-consumer/comment-page-1/#comment-41459</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shesright.org/2008/06/25/more-regulation-that-hurts-business-and-consumer/#comment-41459</guid>
		<description>As written, the fee would apply to &quot;any facility engaged in manufacturing, processing, packing, or holding of cosmetics.&quot;  &quot;Manufacturing&quot; includes making soap in your kitchen or backyard to sell at a farmers market or craft fair.

I am not sure if &quot;holding&quot; would include Mary Kay, etc.  Perhaps the fee would be paid by the company itself, not the consultant.

I think there will be some clarification that will exclude small entrepreneurs, though, before this becomes law.  But that will only happen if people spread the word and put a stop to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As written, the fee would apply to &#8220;any facility engaged in manufacturing, processing, packing, or holding of cosmetics.&#8221;  &#8220;Manufacturing&#8221; includes making soap in your kitchen or backyard to sell at a farmers market or craft fair.</p>
<p>I am not sure if &#8220;holding&#8221; would include Mary Kay, etc.  Perhaps the fee would be paid by the company itself, not the consultant.</p>
<p>I think there will be some clarification that will exclude small entrepreneurs, though, before this becomes law.  But that will only happen if people spread the word and put a stop to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bess</title>
		<link>http://shesright.org/2008/06/25/more-regulation-that-hurts-business-and-consumer/comment-page-1/#comment-41409</link>
		<dc:creator>Bess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shesright.org/2008/06/25/more-regulation-that-hurts-business-and-consumer/#comment-41409</guid>
		<description>Question - would those folks selling their soaps at a local farmer&#039;s market or craft fair be subject to the $2K &quot;fee&quot;?  Or is it just for those who opt to sell online? 

What about independent Mary Kay and Avon consultants and reps? Would it apply to them? 

Interesting bit of news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question &#8211; would those folks selling their soaps at a local farmer&#8217;s market or craft fair be subject to the $2K &#8220;fee&#8221;?  Or is it just for those who opt to sell online? </p>
<p>What about independent Mary Kay and Avon consultants and reps? Would it apply to them? </p>
<p>Interesting bit of news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD Ryan</title>
		<link>http://shesright.org/2008/06/25/more-regulation-that-hurts-business-and-consumer/comment-page-1/#comment-41378</link>
		<dc:creator>JD Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shesright.org/2008/06/25/more-regulation-that-hurts-business-and-consumer/#comment-41378</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that the fee is ridiculous, and prohibitive, but on a more general point, you said:
&lt;i&gt;&quot;It is no secret that I am not a proponent of massive government regulations in the name of so-called consumer safety.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Reading a lot of the drivel you write on here, you should have said:
&lt;i&gt;&quot;It is no secret that I am not a proponent of government regulations in the name of  consumer safety, or for the most part, any kind of regulation that would keep someone from making a buck, regardless.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that the fee is ridiculous, and prohibitive, but on a more general point, you said:<br />
<i>&#8220;It is no secret that I am not a proponent of massive government regulations in the name of so-called consumer safety.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Reading a lot of the drivel you write on here, you should have said:<br />
<i>&#8220;It is no secret that I am not a proponent of government regulations in the name of  consumer safety, or for the most part, any kind of regulation that would keep someone from making a buck, regardless.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

