<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Woman for President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/</link>
	<description>Someone's gotta be right around here.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 09:23:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-44188</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/#comment-44188</guid>
		<description>&quot;Yet it is when it comes to Gov. Palin. Funny how that works.&quot;

Let&#039;s face facts here.  Whether you &amp; I like it or not, Obama has been almost complete &amp; fully vetted on the issue of &quot;experience&quot; through the political process that we&#039;ve gone through so far this year.  I understand that the Right will continually bring up how they think that he isn&#039;t &quot;ready&quot; to be President, but that strategy has been tried and failed already before.

Obama picking Biden means that his polling was showing that he needed someone with more &quot;experience&quot; than he did on his ticket, but picking Biden (someone with basically only Senate experience...just like McSame) undercuts his &quot;change&quot; message by picking a Washington insider.  McSame had to obviously pick someone younger than him, but picking Palin only undercuts his message than Obama isn&#039;t &quot;experienced&quot; enough to be President.  Obama&#039;s message that resume experience is not as important as judgement has resonated this year because the Washington insiders (like Biden &amp; McSame) have gotten all kinds of important decisions wrong...like Iraq for one.  The candidate that fully embraces and represents real change from the horrible status-quo that we have right now will win easily in Novemeber IMO.

&quot;There has been an active campaign to get McCain to pick Palin and she was the obvious choice from the list of potential picks because she reflects McCain’s campaign theme of challenging the establishment, of being a maverick, if you will.&quot;

The idea that McSame was ever a &quot;maverick&quot; or that Palin was the most &amp; best qualified person on the list of potential VPs for McSame is a complete farce, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yet it is when it comes to Gov. Palin. Funny how that works.&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face facts here.  Whether you &amp; I like it or not, Obama has been almost complete &amp; fully vetted on the issue of &#8220;experience&#8221; through the political process that we&#8217;ve gone through so far this year.  I understand that the Right will continually bring up how they think that he isn&#8217;t &#8220;ready&#8221; to be President, but that strategy has been tried and failed already before.</p>
<p>Obama picking Biden means that his polling was showing that he needed someone with more &#8220;experience&#8221; than he did on his ticket, but picking Biden (someone with basically only Senate experience&#8230;just like McSame) undercuts his &#8220;change&#8221; message by picking a Washington insider.  McSame had to obviously pick someone younger than him, but picking Palin only undercuts his message than Obama isn&#8217;t &#8220;experienced&#8221; enough to be President.  Obama&#8217;s message that resume experience is not as important as judgement has resonated this year because the Washington insiders (like Biden &amp; McSame) have gotten all kinds of important decisions wrong&#8230;like Iraq for one.  The candidate that fully embraces and represents real change from the horrible status-quo that we have right now will win easily in Novemeber IMO.</p>
<p>&#8220;There has been an active campaign to get McCain to pick Palin and she was the obvious choice from the list of potential picks because she reflects McCain’s campaign theme of challenging the establishment, of being a maverick, if you will.&#8221;</p>
<p>The idea that McSame was ever a &#8220;maverick&#8221; or that Palin was the most &amp; best qualified person on the list of potential VPs for McSame is a complete farce, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charity</title>
		<link>http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-44187</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/#comment-44187</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;That “experience” issue obviously wasn’t as important to people in both the primary &amp; the general election campaigns.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Yet it is when it comes to Gov. Palin.  Funny how that works.

This pick wasn&#039;t about desperation.  There has been an active campaign to get McCain to pick Palin and she was the obvious choice from the list of potential picks because she reflects McCain&#039;s campaign theme of challenging the establishment, of being a maverick, if you will.

The only desperation is that of the left in their attempt to throw whatever garbage they can find to see what sticks. It&#039;s pathetic.

You are right about it being desperation time, but it&#039;s not for McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;That “experience” issue obviously wasn’t as important to people in both the primary &#038; the general election campaigns.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Yet it is when it comes to Gov. Palin.  Funny how that works.</p>
<p>This pick wasn&#8217;t about desperation.  There has been an active campaign to get McCain to pick Palin and she was the obvious choice from the list of potential picks because she reflects McCain&#8217;s campaign theme of challenging the establishment, of being a maverick, if you will.</p>
<p>The only desperation is that of the left in their attempt to throw whatever garbage they can find to see what sticks. It&#8217;s pathetic.</p>
<p>You are right about it being desperation time, but it&#8217;s not for McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-44186</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/#comment-44186</guid>
		<description>&quot;So why do people like you (and Barack Obama) keep referring to her as former sportscaster or former mayor of a small town?&quot;

Because she is...that&#039;s a *larger part* of her background than being Governor of AK for less than 2 years.  

&quot;Why not stick to the issues instead of trying to paint her as just a pretty face with no capabilities?&quot;

Did I say that she had a pretty face??  The &quot;issue&quot; with her is that she is no way, shape, or form qualified to be President, period.  If the Dems picked a candidate with so little experience in public policy &amp; govt....you can be sure that experience would have been a huge issue...why is Palin getting a pass on that with you guys??  

&quot;It’s time that the left was exposed for being complete hypocrites when it comes to their views of women.&quot;

You can try and lump me in with the liberal bloggers on this one, but that shoe is not going to fit.  Women need to be judged on the same playing field as men.  I voted for Hillary primarily because I thought that she was more qualified to be President than Obama.  That &quot;experience&quot; issue obviously wasn&#039;t as important to people in both the primary &amp; the general election campaigns.  Let&#039;s face it...it&#039;s desperation time for McSame...he &amp; his campaign know that they are doomed if they don&#039;t shake this race up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So why do people like you (and Barack Obama) keep referring to her as former sportscaster or former mayor of a small town?&#8221;</p>
<p>Because she is&#8230;that&#8217;s a *larger part* of her background than being Governor of AK for less than 2 years.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Why not stick to the issues instead of trying to paint her as just a pretty face with no capabilities?&#8221;</p>
<p>Did I say that she had a pretty face??  The &#8220;issue&#8221; with her is that she is no way, shape, or form qualified to be President, period.  If the Dems picked a candidate with so little experience in public policy &amp; govt&#8230;.you can be sure that experience would have been a huge issue&#8230;why is Palin getting a pass on that with you guys??  </p>
<p>&#8220;It’s time that the left was exposed for being complete hypocrites when it comes to their views of women.&#8221;</p>
<p>You can try and lump me in with the liberal bloggers on this one, but that shoe is not going to fit.  Women need to be judged on the same playing field as men.  I voted for Hillary primarily because I thought that she was more qualified to be President than Obama.  That &#8220;experience&#8221; issue obviously wasn&#8217;t as important to people in both the primary &amp; the general election campaigns.  Let&#8217;s face it&#8230;it&#8217;s desperation time for McSame&#8230;he &amp; his campaign know that they are doomed if they don&#8217;t shake this race up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charity</title>
		<link>http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-44185</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/#comment-44185</guid>
		<description>You know, Mr. Guy, Sarah Palin is CURRENTLY the governor of one of the 50 states.  So why do people like you (and Barack Obama) keep referring to her as former sportscaster or former mayor of a small town?  Do you do that with Obama?  With McCain?  Why must you belittle her?  Why not stick to the issues instead of trying to paint her as just a pretty face with no capabilities?

Actually, keep it up.  It&#039;s time that the left was exposed for being complete hypocrites when it comes to their views of women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Mr. Guy, Sarah Palin is CURRENTLY the governor of one of the 50 states.  So why do people like you (and Barack Obama) keep referring to her as former sportscaster or former mayor of a small town?  Do you do that with Obama?  With McCain?  Why must you belittle her?  Why not stick to the issues instead of trying to paint her as just a pretty face with no capabilities?</p>
<p>Actually, keep it up.  It&#8217;s time that the left was exposed for being complete hypocrites when it comes to their views of women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-44184</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 05:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/#comment-44184</guid>
		<description>Sure, that&#039;s why he&#039;s cast over 1,100 votes in the Senate...keep spinning &amp; enjoy that former local AK sportscaster that&#039;s on your GOP ticket now...lol...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, that&#8217;s why he&#8217;s cast over 1,100 votes in the Senate&#8230;keep spinning &amp; enjoy that former local AK sportscaster that&#8217;s on your GOP ticket now&#8230;lol&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chanman</title>
		<link>http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-44183</link>
		<dc:creator>Chanman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/#comment-44183</guid>
		<description>To Mister Guy,
Obama has 4 years in the U.S. Senate, you say?  Sorry, but by no stretch of the imagination is that true.  Before beginning his campaign for the presidency, he spent a grand total of just under 150 days in the Senate.  After that, he was a part-timer at best.

Try again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Mister Guy,<br />
Obama has 4 years in the U.S. Senate, you say?  Sorry, but by no stretch of the imagination is that true.  Before beginning his campaign for the presidency, he spent a grand total of just under 150 days in the Senate.  After that, he was a part-timer at best.</p>
<p>Try again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-44181</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/#comment-44181</guid>
		<description>&quot;McCain’s running mate is not running for president&quot;

No, she&#039;s just going to take over for McSame when he keels over in office...come on now.  All the months of attacks on Obama for being &quot;inexperienced&quot; are to be forgotten now??  This woman only has 6 years as mayor of a small town and less than 2 years as governor of AK of all places...it&#039;s a joke!  And to think that I thought that Obama was maybe pushing it with 8 years in the IL state Senate &amp; 4 years in the U.S. Senate.  She is in no way, shape, or form qualified to be President, and they&#039;ve only spoken once on the phone before he picked her...it&#039;s ridiculous!  She&#039;s had more experience FISHING than she does in public office.  Executive experience is fine, but you have to have had REAL executive experience for it to mean anything.  When was the last time that anything happened of any national importance in AK??

This is just a stab in the dark to try and grab some disaffected, former Hillary supporters, and it won&#039;t work because the vast majority of them aren&#039;t going to vote for a woman that doesn&#039;t believe in abortion rights. 

We&#039;ve been over this Hillary thing a loooong time ago Charity...you wouldn&#039;t even entertain the idea of voting for her because of her stance on issues even though she was a woman, which is fine by me.  You can&#039;t come back months &amp; months later and say that she was &quot;treated like crap&quot;...come on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;McCain’s running mate is not running for president&#8221;</p>
<p>No, she&#8217;s just going to take over for McSame when he keels over in office&#8230;come on now.  All the months of attacks on Obama for being &#8220;inexperienced&#8221; are to be forgotten now??  This woman only has 6 years as mayor of a small town and less than 2 years as governor of AK of all places&#8230;it&#8217;s a joke!  And to think that I thought that Obama was maybe pushing it with 8 years in the IL state Senate &amp; 4 years in the U.S. Senate.  She is in no way, shape, or form qualified to be President, and they&#8217;ve only spoken once on the phone before he picked her&#8230;it&#8217;s ridiculous!  She&#8217;s had more experience FISHING than she does in public office.  Executive experience is fine, but you have to have had REAL executive experience for it to mean anything.  When was the last time that anything happened of any national importance in AK??</p>
<p>This is just a stab in the dark to try and grab some disaffected, former Hillary supporters, and it won&#8217;t work because the vast majority of them aren&#8217;t going to vote for a woman that doesn&#8217;t believe in abortion rights. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been over this Hillary thing a loooong time ago Charity&#8230;you wouldn&#8217;t even entertain the idea of voting for her because of her stance on issues even though she was a woman, which is fine by me.  You can&#8217;t come back months &amp; months later and say that she was &#8220;treated like crap&#8221;&#8230;come on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charity</title>
		<link>http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-44179</link>
		<dc:creator>Charity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/#comment-44179</guid>
		<description>McCain&#039;s running mate is not running for president, last I checked.

This wasn&#039;t faux-anger; this was my genuine feelings.  What makes you think that just because I am a conservative, I like seeing another woman treated like crap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain&#8217;s running mate is not running for president, last I checked.</p>
<p>This wasn&#8217;t faux-anger; this was my genuine feelings.  What makes you think that just because I am a conservative, I like seeing another woman treated like crap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Guy</title>
		<link>http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-44177</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/#comment-44177</guid>
		<description>What the heck does &quot;losing this way&quot; mean anyways??  Hillary lost...it&#039;s over...people lose nomination fights all the time.  Me-thinks that a lot of this is faux-anger in an attempt to get women to vote for McSame.  You want to see someone that&#039;s &quot;less qualified&quot; to be President??  Just look at McSame&#039;s new running-mate...please...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the heck does &#8220;losing this way&#8221; mean anyways??  Hillary lost&#8230;it&#8217;s over&#8230;people lose nomination fights all the time.  Me-thinks that a lot of this is faux-anger in an attempt to get women to vote for McSame.  You want to see someone that&#8217;s &#8220;less qualified&#8221; to be President??  Just look at McSame&#8217;s new running-mate&#8230;please&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/comment-page-1/#comment-44173</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shesright.org/2008/08/28/a-woman-for-president/#comment-44173</guid>
		<description>Jeez, I&#039;m starting to feel bad for making you ride in the backseat during family outings! :)

Seriously, this is a great and insightful post.
Obama&#039;s nomination may have hurt the democrats&#039; chances. These baby-boomer feminists are mad about seeing their &#039;sister&#039; in the cause losing this way.
It&#039;s the lot of liberals though, there&#039;s always a more fashionable protected class to love and faun over. The race baiters, like Al and Jesse, are REALLY not going to take it well when they&#039;re time in the limelight is over!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeez, I&#8217;m starting to feel bad for making you ride in the backseat during family outings! <img src='http://shesright.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously, this is a great and insightful post.<br />
Obama&#8217;s nomination may have hurt the democrats&#8217; chances. These baby-boomer feminists are mad about seeing their &#8217;sister&#8217; in the cause losing this way.<br />
It&#8217;s the lot of liberals though, there&#8217;s always a more fashionable protected class to love and faun over. The race baiters, like Al and Jesse, are REALLY not going to take it well when they&#8217;re time in the limelight is over!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

